|

|
Home
|
|
THE RPOD PAGE LIST
|
|
Webmaster
SOFTWARE
PLEASE
NOTE
All software listed on this
site has been tested and found to function as designed. However, it
is listed for distribution as is. You download and use these
products at your own risk. rpod.biz
offers no technical support or warranties.
|
|
Sponsored Ads |
Changing LINKS
RPOD.biz is a subsidiary of
RPOD.co.uk
RPOD copyright 2008
| |
 |
 |
|
The Scams Syndrome |

|
|
|
 |
|
Advertising exaggerated claims would be considered illegal in many
countries so why are they allowed on the Internet? We've all seen and
heard exaggerated claims that purport to offer an easy mechanism by
which any of us can get rich and many of us would have at least tried
one or two just to check them out, isn't that called human nature? How
many have discovered the offer was a mistake and how many put themselves
into serious debt as a result?
Artistic licence is one thing attempts to leach on the global community
quite another. When it comes to absurd claims that purport to help
individuals find wealth really designed to steal isn't it time the
Internet Community did something to stop this themselves?
The first question is who is responsible - yes ultimately governments,
but they tend to take time to agree even the most practical of issues so
let's leave them out of this equation for now and focus on what action
can be taken in order to help prevent thieves from ruining the lives of
even more vulnerable people.
The focus of this site is the Traffic Exchange so let's look there. Do
Traffic Exchange (TE) owners have a responsibility to ensure that scams
are not displayed on rotation at their sites and thereby shield their
members from them? TE owners already purge their sites of pornography,
gambling and frame-breakers etc, so why not take monitoring to a new
level and really shield vulnerable people from making a mistake that
could cost them dearly?
Is it good enough that TE owners suggest they don't have time to vet
every offer placed or is it an excuse that is today being gradually
diluted as memberships grow thereby increasing the potential for
criminality? Surely there is an opportunity now for professional
Exchanges to offer some level of vetting that may be globally recognized
as a protective mechanism. Surely no one wants their Traffic Exchange
associated with individuals whose only intention is to lure members into
financial ruin?
If you have a view on this
EMail me.
Robert Price
PLEASE NOTE: Your response may be posted. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|